Comparison

Fraud Blocker Alternative & Comparison

Fraud Blocker and ClickPurity land in a similar place on price and detection approach. Here's an honest look at where they actually differ, including a checkable gap in Fraud Blocker's public review presence.

Try ClickPurityWhatsApp Us
Few independent reviewsMany independent reviewsGoogle Ads onlyGoogle + MetaClickPurityFraud Blocker

What Fraud Blocker Actually Is

Fraud Blocker positions itself, per its own site, around device fingerprinting, IP monitoring, and VPN detection, combined into a "fraud score" that drives automatic IP blocking on Google Ads and Meta Ads. Founded in 2019 and based in the Los Angeles area, the company claims over 4,000 customers and says it analyzes roughly 60 million IP addresses per month.

The feature list, per third-party software directories, is broad: customizable detection rules, fraud scoring, session recording, geolocation controls, refund management, and, notably, a recently added email spam protection feature that sits outside the click-fraud category entirely.

Fraud Blocker5,000 clicks/mo (sources vary $39-69)
~$69/mo
ClickPurity Starterflat, any volume
$69/mo

These two land at almost the same entry price. The real differentiators here are platform coverage and independently verifiable reviews, not cost.

One thing worth flagging directly and factually: despite the claimed 4,000+ customer base, independent review platforms show a thin public review presence. Software Advice's own listing for Fraud Blocker shows no reviews at the time of this writing, and G2's review count is similarly minimal relative to competitors like ClickCease. That's a real, checkable gap between claimed scale and independently verifiable customer feedback, not a claim about product quality one way or the other.

Fraud Blocker vs. ClickPurity, Side by Side

FactorFraud BlockerClickPurity
Platform coverageGoogle Ads, Meta/Facebook AdsGoogle Ads only
Starting price$69/mo for 5,000 clicks (sources vary $39-69)$69/mo flat, Starter tier
Core detection signalDevice fingerprinting, IP monitoring, VPN detectionDevice fingerprinting (GPU, audio, screen) primary
Extra featuresSession recording, email spam protectionNone outside click fraud, by design
Independent reviewsMinimal on G2/Software Advice despite claimed 4,000+ customersEarly-stage, growing
Founded2019, Los Angeles, USEarly-stage, Dubai, UAE

Fraud Blocker figures sourced from their own site and third-party software directories (G2, Software Advice, TrustRadius, fitgap) as of 2026 and may have changed. Pricing shows real variance across sources; verify current numbers directly with Fraud Blocker before deciding.

Which One Actually Fits You

Fraud Blocker makes sense if you also advertise on Meta and want one tool covering both platforms, or you want extras like session recording and email spam protection bundled into the same subscription.

ClickPurity makes sense if your spend is Google Ads-only, you want a narrower tool built around one platform rather than a broader feature bundle, or independently verifiable reviews and a transparent track record matter to your decision.

Given how close these two are on paper, the honest advice is to actually trial both. Detection quality is hard to judge from a features list or a pricing page. It shows up in how each tool performs against your specific traffic. Comparing the full field? See all eight tools compared →

Try ClickPurity Free
FAQ

Frequently asked questions.

We can't speak to Fraud Blocker's pricing rationale, only our own. ClickPurity's tiers were set based on our own cost structure and target market, not benchmarked against any specific competitor. The similarity (both start around $69/month) likely reflects that this is a fairly natural entry price point for this category of tool, given several other vendors in this comparison series cluster in a similar range.
Yes, per their own marketing and multiple third-party listings, device fingerprinting is a core part of their detection stack, alongside IP monitoring and VPN detection. This isn't unique to either company. It's a reasonably established technique across most of the tools in this comparison series.
Founded in 2019, US-based (Los Angeles area), with a claimed 4,000+ customers and 60 million IPs analyzed monthly, per their own site. Worth noting directly: multiple independent review platforms (G2, Software Advice) show few or no published reviews for Fraud Blocker despite that customer count, which is a real, checkable gap between their claimed scale and independently verifiable feedback.
Google Ads and Meta/Facebook Ads, per their own site, with Instagram coverage noted in some listings. This is comparable to ClickPurity's Google Ads-only scope, though Fraud Blocker covers one additional major platform.
Their feature list includes "refund management" per one third-party summary, suggesting some overlap with ClickPurity's auto-generated Click Quality evidence, though we don't have visibility into exactly how their refund feature works. Worth asking directly if this capability matters to your decision.

Bottom line: click fraud protection isn't about blocking everything that looks unusual — it's about being precise. ClickPurity identifies the specific device behind a fraudulent click, not just its IP, so your budget reaches real buyers instead of bots and competitors.

Start protecting your budget today

Find out what is really happening to your Google Ads budget.

No contract. Setup in 5 minutes. Cancel anytime. 20–30% of Google Ads clicks are fraudulent — most accounts have never checked.

No credit cardCancel anytime5-minute setupWorks on any website